suman

• Jan 2nd, 2007

 

I think its not like ,there is no controller, but there is no good seperation between the model, view, controller like MVC2

kakkadh

 Profile Answers by kakkadh 

• Jan 9th, 2007

 

MVC1 was a first generation approach that used JSP pages and the JavaBeans component
architecture to implement the MVC architecture for the Web.  HTTP
requests are sent to a JSP page that implements Controller logic and calls out to the ?Model?
for data to update the ?View.? This approach combines Controller and View functionality
within a JSP page and therefore breaks the MVC paradigm. MVC1 is appropriate for simple
development and prototyping. It is not, however, recommended for serious development.

sunil.yadav

 Profile Answers by sunil.yadav 

• Jan 31st, 2007

 

In MVC1 there is controller concept, but view and model were not totally independent with each other or we can say teher was no proper seperation between two, as there was no proper framework designed.

Jai Sharma

• Feb 5th, 2007

 

In MVC1 architecture JSP page act as controller.But there is not enough sepration between Model, View, Controller.i.e. why we can say it is first version of MVC architecture.

atulkumar81

• Apr 23rd, 2007

 

There is MVC means Model, View & Controller, There is no MVC1 & MVC2, There is Model1 & Model2 Architecture

Aarasu

 Profile Answers by Aarasu 

• Aug 5th, 2009

 

There is a controller in MVC1 architecture.
Controller in MVC1 architecture is implemented in jsp along with view of the page.
But the problem is there is no seperate controller in MVC1.
So burden of having both Controller and view in jsp is more.
JSP will implement both Controller and View components.