XYZ
Answered On : Jan 5th, 2006
A is the correct answer
2 Users have rated as useful.
Login to rate this answer.
Interfaces must always be declared as public so that they can be implemented or inherited
1 User has rated as useful.
Login to rate this answer.
C is the correct choice
All statements are true except 'Interfaces can be instantiated'
2 Users have rated as useful.
Login to rate this answer.
Pan
Answered On : Jan 31st, 2006
C is correect answer. Interface can never be instantiated they should always be inherited so that member function should have implementation.
1 User has rated as useful.
Login to rate this answer.
sekhar
Answered On : Feb 24th, 2006
3 is
Login to rate this answer.
sekhar
Answered On : Feb 24th, 2006
3rd is the correct answer since interface has no implemtation they cannot be instiated
Login to rate this answer.
Naresh
Answered On : Apr 1st, 2006
A and D is right Answer
Login to rate this answer.
Guest
Answered On : Apr 20th, 2006
B and C are not true for Interfaces. Interfaces have abstract methods and members whose implementation is done in the derived class. By default all the methods in an Interface are public, so there is no need to explicitly use the public keyword with them. The complier will through a complie time error if we use.
Login to rate this answer.
Prem Kumar Nanda
Answered On : May 9th, 2006
Question: which of the following statements is not true for interfaces
C) Interfaces can be instantiated
Login to rate this answer.
lal
Answered On : Jun 29th, 2006
Answers B & C
B. Interface members should be declared as public, not interfaces.
C. Interfaces can not be instantiated.
Login to rate this answer.
sairam
Answered On : Jan 28th, 2007
the variables intiated in the interfaces are implicitly a final variables .so your answer is wrong.
Login to rate this answer.
Rajesh K
Answered On : Feb 13th, 2007
A) Interface definitions does not have implementationB) Interfaces must be declared as publicD) Interface does not have constructorsThis are answer for the above questions
Login to rate this answer.
Interface definition does not have implementation, they contain only signatures of methods, delegates or events.
Interface members are implicitly public, explicit modifiers are not allowed.
Interface cannot be instantiated directly
Interface cannot contain constructors
Interface cannot contain fields
Interface can itself inherit from multiple interfaces
Login to rate this answer.
The answer is: B and C are not true for interfaces
Login to rate this answer.
(C) & (D) are wrong. Interface can be a type reference but cannot be instantiated. Interface cannot have constructor.
Login to rate this answer.
Its letter C, interfaces can be instantiated
Login to rate this answer.
C is not correct
Login to rate this answer.
interfaces can only be implemented by inheriting and they can not be instantiated
Login to rate this answer.
Pradeepa
Answered On : Aug 8th, 2012
A. Interface definition does not have implementation
Login to rate this answer.
Interfaces can only be implemented by inheriting and they cannot be instantiated.
Login to rate this answer.
sjaiswal
Answered On : Sep 4th, 2012
Interface does not have constructors
Explanation: Interfaces can only be implemented by inheriting and they can not be instantiated.
Login to rate this answer.
C) Interfaces can be instantiated
Login to rate this answer.
C is the correct answer. Interfaces dont have constructors so they cant be instantiated.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-US/library/vstudio/ms173156.aspx
Login to rate this answer.
