Can anyone please tell me the exact difference b/w Rational Functional Tester and Rational Robot. What i think is that RFT is more advanced then Robot.Am i right?What i am trying to do is to create an association b/w datapool and verification point baseline in order to implement dynamic verification points in which baseline values changes with each datapool iteration and we dont have to change them manually. but i haven\'t been successful till now.we have done something similar using RFT but unable to do it using Robot.Is it possible to do it with Robot?If it then how should we do it? can anyone provide us with the similar kind of coding, its very important, plz help!!!

Interview Candidate
Nov 29th, 2005
13
2183

Showing Answers 1 - 13 of 13 Answers

Mujeeb

Mar 28th, 2006

Hi
If you are testing a Java, .NET, Web, or browser-based application RFT (Rational Functional Testger) is the right tool.
If you are testing Visual Basic, C++, or other Windows 32-bit applications, (RFT) Rational Functional Tester is not the tool for you, you can use Rational Robot.
Thanks,
Mujeeb

Amsl

Mar 14th, 2007

Hi
Definately RFT is more enhanced then Robot. But the added advantage which robot provides is performance testing. Yes u can do performance testing using Robot with VU script

Rao

Jul 22nd, 2007

The Main diffrence between Rational Robot and Rational Functional Tester is

Both are Automation tools from rational

Rational robot is used to test the Client Server Applications

Functional tester is used to test the Web applications

vkmittal85
Profile Answers by vkmittal85

May 26th, 2008

rational robot uses sqa basic for scripting while in rational functional tester you can use java or .net as a scripting language.

vkmittal85
Profile Answers by vkmittal85

May 26th, 2008

Rational robot uses sqa basic as the scripting language while in rational functional tester we can use java or .Net as the scripting language.

vishnumittal-testing . blogspot . com