shakilag

 Profile Answers by shakilag 

• Jun 25th, 2009

 

Would go with option 4 due to following reasons:

a) The criticality of modules A and C are not known.
b) The severity of the defects logged in A and B are also not known.

Hence we cannot go with testing A or C on priority without the above information.

ashishks

 Profile Answers by ashishks 

• Sep 9th, 2009

 

Option 4.This much information is insufficient to decide strategy. is correct.

Because we of the following reasons:
1. Priority(Business impact) of all 6 modules are not known.
2. Bug status of all 6 modules are not known.
3. Severity of bugs in A and C are not known.
4. Impact of A and C module on the rest of modules are not known.
5. What was the previous test strategy and risk measurements.

mathan_vel

 Profile Answers by mathan_vel Questions by mathan_vel

• Nov 3rd, 2009

 

Ans)
4.This much information is insufficient to decide strategy.

kurtz182

 Profile Answers by kurtz182 Questions by kurtz182

• Dec 17th, 2009

 

My answer is: 

4. This much information is insufficient to decide strategy

My reasons:

1) We don't know how much test effort was originally applied to each of the modules in order to obtain the test results.  For example, perhaps submodule C is said to contain 150 percent more defects because 150 percent more test effort had been applied to it.  Again, not enough information here.

2) We don't know the relatively complexities of each of these modules. 

3) We don't know the relative value that each of these modules have to the organization.  Perhaps module C relates to a functionality that has much more value than module A.  For example, module C may relate to code that could have significant financial ramifications while module A may relate to code that would carry no financial impact.