Heavy Weight and Light Weight

Why is ejb2.x considered as heavy weight and ejb3.0 is considered as light weight?
What you mean by heavy/light weight?
How it affects the performance of server?

Questions by vinayak_chennai

Showing Answers 1 - 6 of 6 Answers

Srinivas Nalla

  • Jan 18th, 2012
 

EJB 3.0 is not really light-weight. EJB 3.0 differs from its earlier versions in terms of development and performance. Using pojos and annotations, unwanted method implementations and deployment descriptors can be avoided. However, the ejb containers are not light-weight. Containers like EasyBeans are considered light-weight.

  Was this answer useful?  Yes

Srinivas Nalla

  • Jan 18th, 2012
 

EJB 3.0 is not really light-weight. EJB 3.0 differs from its earlier versions in terms of development and NOT performance. Using pojos and annotations, unwanted method implementations and deployment descriptors can be avoided. However, the ejb containers are not light-weight. Containers like EasyBeans are considered light-weight.

  Was this answer useful?  Yes

Give your answer:

If you think the above answer is not correct, Please select a reason and add your answer below.

 

Related Answered Questions

 

Related Open Questions