Prepare for your Next Interview
This is a discussion on why two different think times? within the LoadRunner forums, part of the Software Testing category; Hi I am working on an application under citrix environment. I recorded a script in VuGen. I enabled run-time think-time settings "As Recorded". When I replay script in ...
|
|||
|
why two different think times?
Hi
I am working on an application under citrix environment. I recorded a script in VuGen. I enabled run-time think-time settings "As Recorded". When I replay script in Vugen I got below info in Output window. Why recorded think_time on line 9 is different from think-time in transaction at line 10? Action.c(9): lr_think_time: 17.00 seconds. Action.c(10): Notify: Transaction "transaction_01" ended with "Pass" status (Duration: 40.1583 Think Time: 17.0068). Thanks |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||
|
Re: why two different think times?
It is realy a good question, beacause it is not answered by HP. Everyone knows that there is nothing 100% perfect & accurate in this world, as so the VuGen. During the execution timelines it takes so many redirections & command passages to complete single event. So during this task there is a lapse at many layers( app layer, network layer, server layer). And the same way there is such latency with OS also. this time capturs this latency which is very minimal (un noticable).
So don't worry to much about it. It has happened, It is happening & It will happen.... ![]() Regards, Rajasekhar G |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Types of Processing Times | blenda | Windows | 2 | 10-13-2008 10:26 AM |
| How will you expand the swimming pool 4 times more | mallesh_thavva | Brainteasers | 12 | 04-19-2008 01:51 PM |
| How many times the while loop execute | chandanavemulapally | C and C++ | 7 | 02-26-2008 02:02 PM |
| Food Times - Aloo Palak | Lokesh M | Geeks Lounge | 0 | 10-28-2006 03:51 AM |
| Difference between different times | fred | Unix/Linux | 1 | 07-17-2006 05:33 PM |