soumio

 Profile Answers by soumio 

• Mar 10th, 2010

 

Yes without synchronizing this can be achieved by using final keyword provided it matches with your requirement.

phanibhushan.g

 Profile Answers by phanibhushan.g 

• Mar 11th, 2010

 

Using lock mechanism, synchronization can still be achieved.

java indian

 Profile Answers by java indian 

• Mar 12th, 2010

 

This can be achived  using  the volatile keyword this will be more useful. When multiple threads using the same variable, .

Hutashan Chandrakar

 Profile Answers by Hutashan Chandrakar 

• Apr 5th, 2010

 

Yes we can implement without use keyword synchronized.

We can use flag mechanism logic for locking the object 

kvrprasadmca

 Profile Answers by kvrprasadmca 

• Apr 7th, 2010

 

We can achieve by using thread-safe collection objects like vector and all.

Aqan12

 Profile Answers by Aqan12 Questions by Aqan12

• Apr 13th, 2010

 

Use java.util.concurrent package

Lock mylock;
try
{
mylock.lock();
//critical section
}
finally{
mylock.unlock();
}

Also:
try a lock with a timeout trylock()
wait for some condition: condition.await()
these could come handy to avoid the deadlock situations.