 Related Questions Use a conditional attribute on the method, as shown below: class Debug{[conditional("TRACE")]public void Trace(string s){Console.WriteLine(s);}}class MyClass{public static void Main(){Debug.Trace("hello");}}In Latest Answer : Well, you cant add the namespace System.Diagnostics.ConditionalAttribute. Actually you need to add the namespace System.Diagnostics and capitalise "Conditional" like so:using System;using System.Diagnostics;namespace Debug{ class ... If you leave off the return type on a method declaration, the compiler thinks you are trying to declare a constructor. So if you are trying to declare a method that returns nothing, use void. The following Latest Answer : If your method does not have any return type then mention void before that method or return 0 ... C# requires only a single parameter for delegates: the method address. Unlike other languages, where the programmer must specify an object reference and the method to invoke, C# can infer both pieces of Latest Answer : This article is good.IntroductionIn this article I am going to share my knowledge on Delegates in C#.This would explain the Delegate using simple examples so that the beginner can understand the same.What is Delegate?Definition:Delegate is type which ... Here's a quick example of the DllImport attribute in action: using System.Runtime.InteropServices;class C{[DllImport("user32.dll")]public static extern int MessageBoxA(int h, string m, string Latest Answer : ans:by using1st:using System.Runtime.InteropServicessecond step[DllImport("user32.dll")]use top of the class ... The equivalent of inout in C# is ref. , as shown in the following example: public void MyMethod (ref String str1, out String str2) {...}When calling the method, it would be called like this: String s1;String Latest Answer : Ans:Answer: The equivalent of inout in C# is ref. , as shown in the following example: public void MyMethod (ref String str1, out String str2) {...}When calling the method, it would be called like this: String s1;String s2;s1 = "Hello";MyMethod(ref s1, ... The most common problem is that you used a lowercase 'm' when defining the Main method. The correct way to implement the entry point is as follows: class test {static void Main(string[] args) Latest Answer : class test { public test() { } public static void Main(string[] args) {} } modifier for Main is public and inside the clas default constructor is necessary ... No. The access modifier on a property applies to both its get and set accessors. What you need to do if you want them to be different is make the property read-only (by only providing a get accessor) and Latest Answer : yes,it is possible for get and set to have different access modifiers,but one of the accessors must follow the access level of property. ... In a garbage collected environment, it's impossible to get true determinism. However, a design pattern that we recommend is implementing IDisposable on any class that contains a critical resource. From a versioning perspective, what are the drawbacks of extending an interface as opposed to extending a class? With regard to versioning, interfaces are less flexible than classes. With a class, you can ship version 1 and then, in version 2, decide to add another method. As long as the method is not abstract (i.e., Is it possible to restrict the scope of a field/method of a class to the classes in the same namespace? There is no way to restrict to a namespace. Namespaces are never units of protection. But if you're using assemblies, you can use the 'internal' access modifier to restrict access to only
Sponsored Links
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
